about   this issue   past issues   contact      
ReadMe
Drift Net > net art
The Art of the Camera Phone
Residents of Left Coast’s largest city are never without two things – their cars and their cell phones. So turning phonecams into art was the next natural extension.



Sixspace, an art gallery in downtown Los Angeles, is putting out a call to all camera phone users to submit their cellular snapshots for submission to the gallery's online exhibit SENT.

The in-studio exhibit will open in February 2004 and will feature printed and electronic phonecam works by invited professional photographers and artists. But the online exhibit, which tentatively launches in January, will feature all public submissions -- be they photos of the family cat, the inside of an empty refrigerator, the crazy next door neighbor -- whatever. You snap it, they post it.

"It's this weird limiting format [the camera phone] and we wanted to force photographers to do something really interesting within the limitations of 300 pixels," said Sean Bonner, sixspace's co-curator.

Bonner said the idea for SENT came from Xeni Jardin, a technology writer and SENT co-curator, who thought the invention that prompted dozens of upscale health clubs to freak out and confiscate cell phones at the front door could be used for art.

The spontaneous, unstructured use of camera phones is what marks the difference between a picture taken on a phone and the one taken with a traditional camera, said Bonner.

Unless you're a member of the paparazzi or a tourist you generally don't toddle around town camera in tow, but people always carry their cell phones.

"People take pictures of things [with their phones] that they never would have before. It's documenting the un-noteworthy, it's seeing the world through someone else's eyes just for a second," said Bonner.

Sixspace is talking to the major cell phone companies to see about securing corporate sponsorship for the project.

As for why the dual in-house/online exhibit Bonner said: "Online is the place where the phone photos exist in their perfect form. It's this unifying thing that you can't do with any other medium. To ignore that would be to miss out on a very important thing."
I don't know if I understand
by A Reader on Thursday, 12/04/2003 - 09:43
I don't know if I understand Bonner's statement, "The spontaneous, unstructured use of camera phones is what marks the difference between a picture taken on a phone and the one taken with a traditional camera." Doesn't it seem like the innovation of digital imaging (of which camera phones fall) is really responsible for the upswing in people's willingness to snap spontaneous pics, because you can delete or keep them instantly? I think camera phones--because their picture quality isn't so good--breaksdown the notion of the 'good photo' and thus open the door for uninhibited, spontaneous shots. Interesting angle this guy has, though.
[ ]

maybe, maybe not
by Steve Bryant on Thursday, 12/04/2003 - 11:11
Yeah, I'd agree that the digital camera was largely responsible for the increased popularity of photography (see PMA Marketing Research for precise figures on digital camera popularity over the last few years). But I wouldn't denigrate the amazing market force of camera phones. Like David Pogue said in the NY Times a few months ago, what two gadgets work best when you have them on you at all times -- cell phones and cameras. Camera phones are phenomenal tools for capturing "found moments." I use my Treo 600 every day for just that purpose. And I also have to agree with Bonner when he says the pixel limitation makes the pics an interesting art form (just as the limitations of web colors to 256 makes for interesting uses of color and design). It's like the inverse of a Hasselblat camera.
[ ]

 
Market force and 'limited-lim
by A Reader on Thursday, 12/04/2003 - 18:56
Market force and 'limited-limitless art' are completely different spectrums. I completely agree with the idea that camera phones have opened up an even more spontaneous means of capturing instants, moments, but is this increased interest phenomonon solely due to the increasing popularity of the camera phone? I don't know, I just ask. The fact that the phone is ALWAYS on you makes the arguement of spontaneity more compelling, but did the disposable camera change how we take photos? Yes, yes it did. The idea is compelling, I will say that, very interesting.
[ ]

Recent comments by Bill Gates have stirred up a small backlash among copyright reformists
08.21.2004 - 4:06 pm EDT
"Roshan shares a personal anecdote about P2P software"

07.12.2004 - 1:02 pm EDT
"Sanrio's hyper-cute money maker possesses three foot body"

08.21.2004 - 3:52 pm EDT
"Driftnet Writers Too Broke to Bid!"

Read more from DriftNet »

Also in net art:

By Every Means Necessary

Soul Sista

Art of Noise: In NYC Gallery, Viewers See With Their Ears

Thinking Forward, Looking Back

Seeing is Deceiving

Robotic Art: Who's the Real Artist?

Terminal Man

The Interactive Cityscape